Jul/22
2012

Transgender By Any Other Name

I know that labels can mean a lot, especially medically and legally. But there's another category that, to me, makes the most sense: reality.

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- Does a woman who strongly believes she was meant to be a man have a mental condition or a medical problem? Is a man who cross-dresses in need of psychological help? What about a boy who pretends to be a girl in make-believe games and chooses only female playmates?

The nation's psychiatric establishment is wrestling with these questions, among others, as it works to overhaul its diagnostic manual for the first time in almost two decades. [..] The most symbolic change under consideration so far for the manual's fifth edition, known as the DSM-V for short, is a new name for Gender Identity Disorder, the diagnosis now given to adults, adolescents and children with "a strong and persistent cross-gender identification." In the manual's next incarnation, individuals displaying "a marked incongruence between one's experienced/expressed gender and assigned gender" would be diagnosed instead with "Gender Dysphoria," a term that comes from the Greek word for emotional distress.

Once you're born your gender, as defined by the number of X and Y chromosomes you have, is fixed. Exempting those with medical disorder who have more than two, the rest of us are firmly in the physical category of either male or female. Now whether your mind agrees with that is a different issue entirely, but since birth we're labeled, tagged, printed and numbered, one of the key attributes that goes down to define a specific individual is gender.

Keep in mind, changing your external characteristics will *not* change your DNA. Murders, babies, will all still point back to you regardless of the edits you may have made to your appearance. This is what I was referring to when I said "reality" because like it or not, your DNA is your ultimate reality, binding and immutable. how you want to present yourself, however, is only limited by your imagination. And money. Which is where the real problem comes in...

"Let's say someone born a woman walks into my surgical office and says, `I would like my breasts removed.' What's the diagnosis?" Drescher said. "The procedure is a mastectomy, but if there is no diagnosis, it is cosmetic surgery and your insurance won't pay for it."

It's your body, how you want to modify it is your business, but how people view that modification is theirs. While it may help that the APA can add ambiguity to the definition of 'transgender' it will not resolve custody issues or encourage health insurance companies to ante up for surgery (remember they like premiums, not payments.)

The bottom line is this: being transgender *is* a difficult thing. Not calling it a dysfunction any more may make it seem more acceptable, but it won't make all the problems go away. If anything it simply foists the challenge of decision-making onto other, less prepared, less caring agencies. Is that better? It's hard to say, but changing the label won't change the body you're born with. That's totally up to you.

1 comment
Comment from: odessa [Member] Email
Leave it to the APA to throw another label around that could be applied more broadly. I just hope they reserve it for people who are truly unhappy with their bodies or other aspects of their lives related to gender.

As far as transgender modification is concerned, I doubt they have done enough research to know if people who actually go through modifications are happier. Those people still have to wake up to the same body, although modified, everyday with the same DNA. Do the physical modifications really "cure" the problem?

Hopefully the APA will leave the rest of us who are content to simply not fit into society's cookie cutter definitions alone. I am far from "girly-girl" and I know plenty of people, men and women, who don't fit nicely into "gender roles" or even "identity" for that matter. It in it's self does not bother them. The distress comes from outside themselves (i.e. harassment from bullies) so I would not call it an "illness". In that regard it is society with the illness. Fortunately the lines of acceptable and unacceptable regarding strict definitions of gender roles have blurred over the past few decades or so. For example, women wearing pants to work and men nurturing their children is down right normal now. I wonder where we will be in another couple of decades.
07/22/12 @ 09:03